Primary colors as a source of possible misconceptions: an insight into teaching and learning about color
In the field of science education, color can provide an interdisciplinary learning content, potentially suitable for overcoming disciplinary fragmentation and promoting in students a general attitude towards dealing with problems. However, because of its polysemic nature, it is very difficult to make students able to interpret, within the theoretical paradigm of modern science, a concept that they first learn to know through perceptual experience. As a pervasive phenomenon of our daily life, color vision gives rise, indeed, to a variety of naïve conceptions – similar to the pre-Newtonian ones – that act as a filter to the new learning contents. In this context we identified, through a historical-epistemological analysis, the ancient contrast between simple and compound colors as a source of potential misconceptions to be investigated empirically. We hypothesized we could detect some misconceptions due to the lack of awareness of the different contexts – physics, physiology of vision, painters’ practice – in which the distinction between primary and secondary colors can be introduced, assuming different meanings in each one. We also believed that these misconceptions were relatively independent of the subjects’ level of education (children/teachers). Then an empirical research was conducted by administering two different self-completed questionnaires to a non-probabilistic sampling of convenience made up of primary school teachers and fifth-grade pupils, respectively. The results of research on both teachers’ and children’s misconceptions seem to confirm what hypothesized.
Agazzi, E. (2014) Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer.
Anderson, C. W. and Smith, E. L. (1986) ‘Children's Conceptions of Light and Color: Understanding the Role of Unseen Rays’. Michigan: The Institute for Research on Teaching. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED270318. (Accessed: 27 March 2019).
Bachelard, G. (2002) The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen.
Brousseau, G. (1983) ‘Les obstacles épistémologiques et les problèmes en mathematiques’, Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 4(3), pp. 165-198.
Corbetta, P. (2003) La ricerca sociale: metodologia e tecniche. Le tecniche quantitative. Bologna: Il Mulino, vol. II.
De Grandis, L. (2000) Teoria e uso del colore. Milano: Mondadori.
Feher, E. and Meyer, K. R. (1992) ‘Children's conceptions of color’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), pp. 505-520.
Gardner, H. (2004) The unschooled mind: how children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
Giudice, F. (2009) Lo spettro di Newton. Roma: Donzelli.
Haagen, C. (2014) ‘Simple experiments supporting conceptual understanding of body colour’, Pridobljeno, 12(4), 2017.
Hawkins, D. (1985) ‘Barriere critiche alla comprensione delle scienze’, in Cortini, G. (eds) Le trame concettuali delle discipline scientifiche. Problemi dell'insegnamento scientifico. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, pp. 127- 143.
La Rosa, C. and Mayer, M. (1991) ‘Luce e colori’, in Grimellini Tomasini, N. and Segrè, G. (eds) Conoscenze scientifiche: le rappresentazioni mentali degli studenti. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, pp. 185-229.
Martini, B. (2000) Didattiche disciplinari. Aspetti teorici e metodologici. Bologna: Pitagora.
Martini, B. (2018) ‘La dialettica sapere formale/sapere della pratica alla luce della dialettica sapere/sapere da insegnare’, METIS. Mondi Educativi, 8(2), pp. 50-67.
Mason, L. (2006) Psicologia dell'apprendimento e dell'istruzione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Martinez-Borreguero, G., Pérez-Rodríguez, Á. L., Suero-López, M. I. and Pardo-Fernández, P. J. (2013) ‘Detection of misconceptions about colour and an experimentally tested proposal to combat them’, International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), pp. 1299-1324.
McMullin, E. (1985). ‘Galilean idealization’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 16(3), 247-273.
Morin, E. (1999) La tête bien faite: repenser la réforme, réformer la pensée. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Newton, I. (1671–72). ‘New theory about light and colors’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 80, pp. 3075–3087. Available at: http://www.newtonproject.ox.ac.uk/view/texts/diplomatic/NATP00006. (Accessed: 22 March 2019).
Piana, G. (2000) ‘L'esperienza della transizione e il sistema dei colori’. Archivio di Giovanni Piana. Available at: http://filosofia.dipafilo.unimi.it/~piana/index.php/filosofia-dellesperienza. (Accessed: 22 March 2019).
Şahin, Ç., İpek, H. and Ayas, A. (2008) ‘Students' understanding of light concepts primary school: A cross-age study’, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science learning and teaching, 9(1), pp. 1-19.
Shapiro, A. E. (1994) ‘Artists’ Colors and Newton’s Colors’, Isis, 85(4), pp. 600-630.
Strike, K. A. and Posner, G. J. (1992) ‘A revisionist theory of conceptual change’, in Duschl, R. and Hamilton, R. (eds) Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 147-176.
Tombolato, M. (2018) ‘La dialettica generale/specifico alla luce del costrutto didattico di ostacolo epistemologico’, Formazione & Insegnamento. Rivista internazionale di Scienze dell’educazione e della formazione, 16(2), Supplemento, pp. 205-214.
Vosniadou, S. (2003) ‘Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning’, in Sinatra, G. M. and Pintrich, P. R. (eds) Intentional conceptual change. London: LEA, pp. 377-406.
Copyright (c) 2014 Cultura e Scienza del Colore - Color Culture and Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The "Cultura e Scienza del Colore - Color Culture and Science" journal is registered at the Court of Milan at n.233 of 24.06.2014.
The journal is an open access journal, free for readers and authors and has joined ROAD, the Directory of Open Access scholarly Resources, since 2014. Articles published in the “Cultura e Scienza del Colore - Color Culture and Science" journal are open access articles, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The copyright is retained by the author(s).