Two theories for a model: the “querelle” between Klee and Ostwald
Framed in the time of history, the comparative theories of colour expressed not only give us a sort of "distillate" of chromatic culture, but also constitute a precious instrument of investigation, useful in the syncretic comparison of thoughts and positions, sometimes very different from each other, as in the case of the "querelle" between Paul Klee and Wilhelm Ostwald, a question proposed here again. This type of comparison, addressed in the 2017 conference on circular models, is developed here on biconical models, starting with those of Wilhelm Ostwald and Paul Klee, assuming and confirming the classification and analytical structuring of the models through the parameters adopted in Polychrome (Marotta 1999). It should be remembered that Klee publicly took a stand against Ostwald's theory and his model, but in fact assumed the essential geometry of the model of the chemist himself. The present investigation therefore aims to better clarify (in the face of formal analogies) the differences in objectives and scientific and artistic content. The work confirms that the position taken by Klee and his followers was partly prejudicial, linked to his artistic training and related experiences in the field, to which his intellectual milieu was no stranger. The position of the chemist is symmetrical, linked to the rigor of his scientific profile (although completed by the practice of painting). The substantial rapprochement of their respective convictions confirms the open-mindedness and maturity to which the two protagonists have arrived. In addition to describing cultural matrices, parameters and essential characteristics of the models examined, of particular interest is the scope of the applications already put in place of the models, or possible future developments, also connected to new methodologies (such as virtual and digital) in the color project, up to the experiments in concrete and material production. The most innovative digital virtual modes will allow to verify the analogies and differences (of forms and contents) of the respective models.
Marotta A. (1999) ‘Policroma, Dalle teorie comparate al progetto del colore’, Torino: Celid.
Marotta A., Vitali M. (2017) ‘La modellazione tridimensionale come espansione concettuale dei modelli del colore‘, Napoli: XIII Conferenza del Colore 2017.
Geelhaar C. (1972) ‘Paul Klee und das Bauhaus‘, Köln: DuMond Schauberg.
Cherchi P. (1978) ‘Paul Klee teorico‘, Bari: De Donato
Klee P. (1920) ‘Confessione creativa‘, Schöpferische Konfession,
Norderstedt: BoD Buchshop.
Klee P. (1956) ‘Das Bildenrische deuken. Schriften zur form und
gestaltungslehre‘, Basel: Schwabe & Co. Ed. italiana: DORFLES G. (acura di), Teorie della forma e della figurazione, Feltrinelli, Milano 1959.
Ostwald W. (1922) ‘Die Farbenfibel, Verlag Unesma GmBH
Birren F. (1969) ‘The color primer: a basic treatise on the color system of
Wilhelm Ostwald‘ New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Wingler H. M. (1962) ‘Das Bauhaus. Weimar-Dessau-Berlin 1919-1933‘ Bramsche: Rasch & Co. Verlag. Ed. italiana: F. Dal Co (a cura di), Il Bauhaus. Weimar-Dessau-Berlino. 1919-1933, Feltrinelli, Milano 1972, p. 312.
Zevi B. (1974) ‘Poetica dell’architettura neoplastica’ Torino: Einaudi.
Itten J. (1962) ‘Kunst der Farbe‘ Ravensburg: Otto Maier.
Albers J. (1962) ‘Interaction of color‘, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Copyright (c) 2014 Cultura e Scienza del Colore - Color Culture and Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The "Cultura e Scienza del Colore - Color Culture and Science" journal is registered at the Court of Milan at n.233 of 24.06.2014.
The journal is an open access journal, free for readers and authors and has joined ROAD, the Directory of Open Access scholarly Resources, since 2014. Articles published in the “Cultura e Scienza del Colore - Color Culture and Science" journal are open access articles, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The copyright is retained by the author(s).